Talk:Hyper–Rayleigh scattering

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 April 2020 by reviewer Kirbanzo (talk · contribs).

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 13 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Noncontroversial reversion of accidental move b uidhe 00:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper–Rayleigh scattering optical activity → Hyper–Rayleigh scattering – The page was briefly moved to the proposed title by Vycl1994 on grounds of conciseness. I believe it was the proper title (as it was concise, felt natural, and would likely be the common name) and the current title is not concise and no better than the original title it was published under. Therefore the move to the current title should be undone. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 01:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I moved it correctly, then restored to a longer title through a series of misclicks. I do support the WP:LOWERCASE and WP:CONCISE move proposed above, and it was my original intention. Vycl1994 (talk) 20:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Conflicting source suggests ambiguity in nomenclature

A 1991 Physical Review Letters article (Clays, K. and Persoons, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66 (23), 2980-2983, https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2980) reports observation of this phenomenon, while the Wikipedia article states that it was not observed until 2019. It is possible that the Wikipedia article and the Phys. Rev. Lett. article refer to different, but related, phenomena that are called by the same name. For instance, the article specifies that a chiral substrate is required for the effect, while the Phys. Rev. Lett. article refers to non-centro-symmetric but achiral substrates. Wkopcha (talk) 16:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]