Talk:Hypericum iwatelittorale
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Hypericum iwate-littorale)
Hypericum iwatelittorale has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 26, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hypericum iwatelittorale/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Eewilson (talk · contribs) 20:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Description:
- I removed a small redundancy.
They are a paler color on the undersides and have a papery texture.
"They" is an unclear pronoun.The length of stem between leaves is usually longer than the leaves themselves.
Make it make sense.There are dense, pale, point-shaped glands on the surface of the leaves...
Pale? Is a color mentioned here?
- Double checked, it does say "laminar glands pale..."
Just a beginning of notes from my phone. More later. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 04:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Eewilson, looking forward to the full review. Fritzmann (message me) 18:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't find any other issues. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.