Talk:I Love New York season 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I Love New York season 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about to talk about the future outcome of the show. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about to talk about the future outcome of the show at the Reference desk.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Television: Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

List of episodes, where is it?

Where's the link that has description of each episodes and what happened, it was removed, why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.190.114 (talk) 13:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winner!

Tailor Made is the winner.. proof: http://www.megavideo.com/?v=W4VIG0M8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.55.222 (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminate the Voting Date's as the dates passed.

Some of the date of the voting and video upload dates have sinced been passed. Is there something to do to eliminate the passed dates so no one get confused.

Semi-Protecting This Page

I put in a request to get this page to be be Semi-Protected. For the regular editors on here, we can easily see the anonymous ip vandalism happening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinkleheimer (talk • contribs) 19:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Also Request Semi-Protection. There is ongoing vandalism to the article. - Dementor654 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.242.186 (talk) 04:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Voluntarily Leaving Competition Colors"

I was just wanting to get everyone's opinions on what color that "voluntarily leaving the competition's" color should be.

This is the current color.

This is the same color as last season

I propose that we reserve Lime-Green for the winner, and use the same color as last season to specify that the contestant left. Please state your opinions. Once we get a cosensus, it can be changed. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 20:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Missjessica254 18:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...Just wanted to say that the little chart thingy is wrong...Tailor made wasn't cut in the 4th episode. 20 pack was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.244.11.102 (talk) 07:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Viewer's Choice Contestants

How do you find the information regarding the controversey? How do you know which contestants had support or not? I'm a new viewer of the show and was reading this article to see who had been eliminated and was puzzled by this paragraph. Missjessica254 18:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode 4

Why are we putting in a random call-out order for episode 4 when there was none in the first place? Leave Mr. Wise in the first spot (was called to stay first), then put Buddha and 20 Pack in the 7 and 8 slots. I put N/A in all of the slots not applicable, so people will not get confused.

~Thanks! Drew :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.139.39 (talk) 01:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can do what you did to Mr Wise, 20 Pack, and Buddha. But, instead of putting N/A, put the rest of the people's name in alphabeticle order. Did I spell "alphabeticle" right??? Thanks! User:Cookie Monster (User talk:Cookie Monster) 22:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.187.105 (talk) [reply]

Webpage Editing

I looked at the page yesterday and it looked perfect. Also, I looked at it today and the page is messed up. Here were some things that were messed up in the page:

  • The contestants call out order
  • The list of contestants on the show. For example, who is drc, there's nobody on the show named drc.
  • Why is there no episode information on the page like last season's page?
  • Who put that they pee pee in their pants.
  • "Tailor Made is the best and most protective person in the show. I don't want him eliminated." All the
    producers, the fans and the viewers keep saying that on their myspace.
  • I want candy, bubblegum and taffy. Skip to the sweetshop with my sweetheart Sandy. I want candy, gimme some
    candy, I eat candy, I like candy, I eat candy until I am dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.187.105 (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tailor Made

On Ms.Jones in the morning Tailor Made was a guest and to introduce him Ms.Jones said the winner of i love ny 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartie.Pantz4 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  -Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -S.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Switchiedagger (talk • contribs) 06:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea wikipedia is not a crystal ball. And even if that were true... dude the winner can't say he did so because that is a direct violation to their contract. —Preceding unsigned 04:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You are right. When I saw the season finale on VH1, Tailor Made did win I Love New York 2. User:Cookie Monster (User talk:Cookie Monster) 22:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.187.105 (talk) [reply]

"Nigger"

Someone edited a contestants name with the word "Nigger". Im not too sure on who is the one that had his name replaced, im thinking it was Buddha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.179.70 (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...yea, your SO right. Must've been Buddha, not the 2million vandalizers that visit this site every day, it was Buddha. Your just like Sherlock man, no joke. -NoXiFy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.195.135.159 (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NoXiFy, how dense can someone be? The original post meant that Buddha's name had been changed to "N*****". Not that Buddha had done it. Check your sarcasm next time. Lnkinprk777 (talk) 21:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOFix is a fucking idiot.65.0.9.147 (talk) 03:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned Trivia

Just thought that I would throw out the external link to the specific episode of "Gay, Straight or Taken" that Buddha was on, which is mentioned in the article under Trivia. It can be found here. Thanks. 65.184.181.80 23:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

episodes?

I think it's about time an episode list should be added. The page doesn't really follow the guidelines without it. The no erz 05:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination Chart

The charts should wait to be updated until the 9pm episode, because some people have not yet seen the show, and would spoil it for them. Anyone else agree? Please only respond if you have a username. Thanks. --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The chart was vandalized, speaking of the Elimination Chart. Just a heads-up to make sure it isn't vandalized anymore. SanjuroHayashida 14:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It wasn't vandalized. I work for Vh1. (Phrasia 22:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  - Even if you work for VH1, it shouldn't be updated until after the episode is shown on TV, due to possible spoilers. 68.118.197.249 10:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The chart for every Flavor of Love spinoff has always been updated after the morning airing. Wikipedia isn't here not to spoil people. If the information is out there we should put it on. Just because someone hasn't seen the morning airing doesn't mean the information shouldn't be added.--Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 02:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a major spoiler considering 95% of the people watch the 9pm airing of the show. It needs to be removed until the morning after, not the morning of. dadadadadamnson (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know 95% of the people watch the 9pm airing? You have no proof of that. The chart should be updated at the first airing, not the second. Admc2006 (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Admc said. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 23:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Admc said. Electricalen (talk) 01:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be added for the finale. For all we know someone can come on here and put the wrong info, all were asking for is to wait until the 9pm airing, it's not that hard!--Yankeesrj12 (talk) 19:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why change when we have been doing it for every Flavor of Love show and spinoff? And of course people are going to come in and put in wrong info. That's what happens after each elimination/finale. We can just ask for semi-protection. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 21:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All were asking for is the season finale! Just wait, will it really kill you?--Yankeesrj12 (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter anyways. When an actual "finale" happens on VH1, they usually do not show the finale until the show's scheduled show time (9 PM EST in this case). During the day when the "early" airing happens, they are running a marathon of the entire season. So in the end, it doesn't matter because no one will know the winner until the 9 PM EST (if they follow their usual pattern).--71.13.239.254 (talk) 11:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The names of all the episodes and what happened in them

I wanted to list all the names of the episodes of ILNY2 and talk about what happened in each episode.

Real names

Can someone list the real names of the contestants?

Already taken care of, and in the future and you sign your posts. (Phrasia (talk) 03:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

New York and Tailor Made's Engagement

Shouldn't the sentence in the article that says New York and Tailor Made are engaged be removed. The citation used is a link that leads to an article where the source of the speculation is unidentified. This should be removed until the engagement is confirmed by the couple. Js70068 (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DRINK MA JUICE BIOTCH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartie.Pantz4 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chance?

I didn't watch much of Season 2 (I did season one) but I would have SWORN I saw Chance somewhere in the second season, perhaps the first episode. Was I imagining things or did something happen with him? I can't find any information about it. Thanks AquaStreak (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Him and Real were part of an episode. They made it look like in the previews that he would come back, but he didn't. What actually happened was Buddha was kicked off for fighting, but was brought back by New York. So yeah. :DTrevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 05:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture?

The picture of the I Love New York 2 cast was removed from the page for no reason and it was up there about a month ago. Please fix this and put a picture of the cast on the page. This is ridiculous. User:Cookie Monster (User talk:Cookie Monster) 22:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no room for balderdash

How in Heaven's name can you possibly pretend that tripe like this belongs in Wikipedia? Do you think for one moment that, back in the 1960s, in the days of real encyclopedia, an "article" (I can't even bring myself to call it that without gagging) like this would be allowed?

Can you imagine the respected "Encyclopedia Britannica", for instance, containing an entry like this detailing a so-called "reality" (again, I am gagging) television show? I cringe.

This is not academic material. Not by the most infinite stretch of the imagination.

Please, Wikipedia, delete this twaddle !

Please !

Otherwise you have no right to claim any sense of legitimacy as an encyclopedia.

--Atikokan (talk) 06:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:AFD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Love New York 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905203349/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i5d843c633b3a4760ee9785fa0b974ceb to http://hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i5d843c633b3a4760ee9785fa0b974ceb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]