Talk:Immigration law

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Mid-importance).

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Immigration law be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

The article right now is pretty stubby, and I think would be better done as a disambiguation page with forks to Immigration to the United States, Immigration to the United Kingdom (1922-present day), etc. Wl219 09:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree, as I see this article as growing and focusing on the legal aspects, with links to such other articles. Bearian 16:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Avertising?

What's with the big section in the middle written in the first person? Is this an advertisement for CLESPA, or an article about immigration law in the United States? -12.70.92.162 (talk) 22:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right. Thanks for pointing that out. I've remvoed it now. Will Beback talk 23:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found a second piece of advertising in this page. Under the External links, it seems like there's a group of links that simply link to a private immigration firm. I don't understand why those would be provided under the external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.202.151.130 (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

simply incorrect

The section on the UK is simply wrong - how do I know. run a uk immigration practice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.183.160 (talk) 23:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A big comparison

I have created a table comparing migration categories in different countres. There are many blank places there, unfrtunately I cannot fill them all. Please update the table if you know something on specific legislation. This table us going to be an important fource of initial information of those who is thinking about changing country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curious735 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progress - POV

Progress seems like a POV word to me. A better wording could be: There have been various additions and changes to the immigration laws in the United States.

Chinese Exclusion Act - Date

There seems to lack a date on the Chinese Exclusion Act. "Many years later" is not very helpful. May 6, 1882 is the correct date, right? I am not an experienced Wikipedian and therefore I have not made the correction myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonwaever (talk • contribs) 16:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence that does not make sense

The sentence "Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Customs and Border Protection." must lack something as it makes no sense. Does anyone know what is meant to be said by this sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonwaever (talk • contribs) 16:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing various legal issues

This Article may need some major rework from a legal standpoint. I'll list some points where this Article could be improved upon (mostly as a reminder for myself, but comments are always welcome):

I would not discuss the issue of "European Union migration law". For one, from what I know, the EU does not decide on individual migrant applications themselves, and any Regulations/Directives passed by the EU legislature merely introduce categories of visa's/permits which the individuals Member States have to implement. Further, in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Part I, Title V of the TFEU), there are various opt-outs (e.g. UK/Ireland and Denmark have opted-out of the Blue Card regime). Certain aspects, such as the (short-term) Schengen Visa, is subject to an entirely separate regime, to which some non-EU States are Party.
I would either expand on the content of other countries' immigration laws (which would be a huge effort), or remove the mention of the US immigration law (perhaps relegating it to the 'See also' section. Otherwise, it might give the impression of the US immigration regime being representative of the world's immigration laws. A suggestion for the former is perhaps to group them by regions. For Europe, the general description could then include the issues of EU migration 'laws', Schengen, and the opt-outs, with wikilinks to the more specific articles.
I would remove the issues of citizenship from the immigration laws (table) entirely, perhaps moving them to a separate section on Access to Citizenship instead. This is due to the fact thatnot all countries consider citizenship/nationality and migration together. Many of the issues are considered as separate laws (e.g. separate Citizenship Laws, Immigration Laws, Visa Laws/policies (sometimes in Passport legislation)).
For the same reasons, I would separate (or at least clearly denote the differences between) short-term immigration (i.e. visas) and 'longer-term' immigration (e.g. residence permits). Often (from what I know of various EU immigration laws), there are separate categories for short-term and long-term visas/permits, and these categories do not always overlap or equate. Especially in the EU, countries that are part of Schengen generally have one uniform visa law (i.e. Schengen Visa Code), but they retain their individual residence-migration laws and policies.

These are just some of the issues I think would greatly improve this Article. I'll try to get around to them as much as I can. --talk2Chun^{(talk) (contributions)} 15:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Immigration law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "In the United States"

I just removed that section and instead added Immigration to the United States to the See also section. This article is about immigration law in general, not in the US, and it should have a global scope. The inclusion of a section specific to the United States implies that the laws there are representative of many/most/all nations (they clearly are not) and/or that all other nations should have their own special sections too, which is both impractical and essentially impossible. Additionally, the information in "In the United States" was either irrelevant, outdated, incomplete, poorly written, opinionated, lacking quality citations, or some combination thereof. If someone would like to add relevant information specific to the United States and is able to express it in a neutral manner, please do so. DadOfBeanAndBug (talk) 01:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Immigration law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120710145601/http://www.immd.gov.hk/ehtml/faq_cies.htm to http://www.immd.gov.hk/ehtml/faq_cies.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]