Talk:Impact of self-driving cars

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Text and/or other creative content from Self-driving car was copied or moved into Impact of self-driving cars. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

introductory section needs more inline citations

Honestly, just that. its clearly summarizing claims below, but should really be inline regardles. homo momo (talk) 16:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lede should summarise what's in the rest of the article, so it is not usually required to cite things in the lede assuming they're cited later. WP:LEAD says As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate, although it is common for citations to appear in the body and not the lead. ColinFine (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to keep the 4 paragraphs rule, but also shortened it somewhat. I also did some amount of work trying to clean up some of the sections below, and keeping a more neutral tone around the public health section. homo momo (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

crash reduction is its own debate

I think some groups have argued that crashes haven't gone down as much with current self-driving cars, which has initiated a debate around how much crashes really will go down. May be worth trying to capture that debate rather than trying to quote the most optimistic estimates. homo momo (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, more I read this, less it gives off encyclopedic tone. Much of it is more an essay extolling the virtues of AVs especially the introductory section. homo momo (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Essay-like

Gave it my best shot a few months ago, but Welfare and all sections below need more edits (copyeditting?) to sound less like an essay and more encyclopedic. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]