Talk:Indian spot-billed duck
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian spot-billed duck article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Eastern/Indian Spot-billed Duck
[edit]This article is currently confusing. Either it should be reverted to Spot-billed Duck to include all subspecies, or kept as Indian, but remove the Chinese Spot-billed Duck references as that pertains to the Eastern Spot-billed Duck which we currently have as a redirect, which we then can create a new page for since some tax web sites now split them (Birdlfe International, Clements, and Sibley & Monroe). Howard and Moore have them currently lumped but understand a new volume is out soon?....Thoughts??.....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Indian Spot-billed Duck → Spot-billed Duck – Current structure is sloppy. Article discusses proposed taxonomic split into Indian and Eastern Spot-billed Duck, but article title is listed with name after split has occurred. I propose to use former name prior to split to make aticle body and article title match...Pvmoutside (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support proper name for the current treatment. —innotata 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.