Talk:Information Today

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 October 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by David Gerard (talk · contribs) on 19 October 2021.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

List of publications

Headbomb, how is an unsourced list of publications with no context helpful to our readers? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It tells which publications the publisher publishers. By all means feel free to add a ^{[citation needed]} tag or to source things, but removal is not an improvement. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It will inevitably be an incomplete list with no indication of why we have selected any particular publications. This is a clear fail of WP:NOTDIR number 7, IMO. We can build it back with notable books, but as it stands it is not useful. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

we are kurdish

we are kurdish we can have emoji flag kurdish 212.237.123.184 (talk) 23:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]