Talk:Instruction creep
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Instruction creep article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article is rated as Start-class because citations are needed. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Multiple issues
[edit]This article has multiple issues:
- Both given references are merely examples.
- Most of the text seem to be essay-like extrapolation, speculation and original research.
- Is this term really used to a notably degree? I made several searches with google, and I am not really convinced: Its field of use seems to be very narrow, and somehow it seems to be used mostly as slogans in slogan-heavy books, not in real-life.
- The wording is not appropriate. Generally it is essay-like. Also it uses strange jargon ("control others via fiat").
- Context and scope are not clear. The first paragraph is rather confusing than explaining.
-- Tomdo08 (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Following up to one of Tomdo08's points, is this any different from red tape? And if so, does the difference warrant having 2 different articles? --Chealer (talk) 02:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)