Talk:Irish Daily Mail

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British version

Should some mention be made of the British version's "anti-Irish" stance. You'd need referemces and I@m not sure how it could be worded but don't think it should go unmentioned as it is a huge factor in stopping some people from reading it Dodge 12:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that should go in as one of the reasons for poor sales, but I couldn't find a decent reference to back it up. Cordless Larry 14:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A separate newspaper?

Is this a different newspaper to the Daily Mail, or just a different edition of the same newspaper? According to the Audit Bureau of Circulations [1] it's a different edition of the same newspaper. Demiurge 09:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's essentially a different edition, with its own editor, but borrows heavily from the UK version, from what I know. Cordless Larry 09:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this could become part of the main Daily Mail article, as with the Irish Sun. I don't know enough about how the UK and Irish editions differ though to judge whether or not it merits a seperate article. Cordless Larry 14:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Columnists

A comment is made that Mary Ellen whatshername has controversial views on travellers. The word travellers is linked to an article on tourism. I suspect that what was intended was that she has controversial views on The Travellers, an Irish ethnic minority.

But I could well be wrong, so I'll make no change myself. I merely throw this out as a possibility.

TRiG (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's Irish Travellers - she has un-PC views on them, but that is not controversial in Ireland itself.86.46.192.59 (talk) 09:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates?

The first paragraph states that the paper was launched in 2006. The second says that circulation had fallen by 2006. Should that be 2008? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.240.7.42 (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irish Daily Mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]