Talk:It Don't Come Easy

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance

This Apple Records/Apple Corps-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Rumours

I think "rumours" are OK if and only if the "rumour" is itself verifiable and has been propogated some quotable sources, e.g. some reputable Beatles biographies. In other words, {{fact}}.

Personally I've wondered about it too. I have George's demo - which is great - and it sure sounds like a George song. I suspect that George wrote it and Ringo chipped in a few ideas. The thing is of course, rumours spread by idle tongues like mine don't ordinarily belong in WP articles. --kingboyk 22:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC) P.S. Don't forget an infobox and a scan of the single cover (if it had a PS).[reply]

I doubt you still have this bookmarked, Stephen, but I'm going to respond to your comments anyway (more than a year later). What do "Don't Pass Me By," "Octopus's Garden" and "Back Off Boogaloo" all have in common? Ringo's signature style; bouncy major key music, and rather unsophisticated song construction and lyrics. "It Don't Come Easy" doesn't sound like any of these compositions - despite being sandwiched by them chronologically.

The evidence: The song is minor key, and has sophisticated song construction and lyrics - all of which mimic Harrison's style.

George recorded a guide vocal for Ringo. This would not be necessary if Ringo wrote the song. Ringo couldn't remember the lyrics at Bangla Desh, shortly after the song was a radio hit. The "Hare Krishna" chant in the background certainly wasn't an idea proposed by Ringo. Ringo did not have any publishing success before this recording, which was a concern expressed by all of The Beatles. And George produced and recorded all over the song.

Any of these by themselves might not be much evidence, but taken as a whole... I have to conclude that this song was written by George Harrison and given to Ringo as a publishing present. Or, at the very least, George gave major assistance to Ringo in its construction.ZincOrbie 01:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The opening paragarph doesn't make sense. If Ringo admitted he didn't write it, why is it controversial since we have the George demo? It makes no sense! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.179.230 (talk) 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

I removed the speculation about Harrison's contribution to writing the song that were based on Harrison singing the lead vocal on a bootlegged recording of the song. That doesn't prove anything; Harrison may have been singing for a number of reasons, and we can't speculate about it in the article. All the speculation and WP:OR above should be ignored. It doesn't matter if the song is in a minor key, or sounds like Harrison's style: we need solid, verifiable evidence from a reliable source to say that Harrison wrote or co-wrote the song. If we are going to mention rumors, we need reliable evidence for that, too.

I left in the part where Starr says Harrison co-wrote it, but added a citation needed tag. Quotes must be cited. — John Cardinal (talk)

How long should this be left without a citation? 203.45.146.36 (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

I'm not disputing the sources about Gary Wright playing piano, especially as there were several recorded versions, but the late Kenny Craddock of Ginger Baker's Airforce and later Lindisfarne fame said in an an interview in 1997 that he did so. Should this not be mentioned? Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://archive.robertianhawdon.me.uk/sites/lindisfarne.co.uk/archives/interviews/ivkc97p1.htmCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). and the relevant extract: 'One night we met this guy called Terry Doran who was George Harrison's man, his assistant or roadie, whatever you like to call him, he'd been with the Beatles from very early on and he became a good friend of ours. He took us out to George's house, when George wasn't around, and we were all marvelling at this fantastic place, plus George also owned the very first Moog synthesiser in this country, which I managed to get to work. Terry would get us the odd gig or session and when he asked me if I wanted to play on one of George and Ringo's, I said yeah, a bit nervous, but I'll do it. So I got the gig and it turned out to be playing piano on the single 'It Don't Come Easy', which I think ended up around number four in the charts in April 1971. I got a hundred pounds for it, which was about three times the normal session rate in those days, so I was quite happy.' Brentx45 (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Currently, there is a clear inconsistency between the main text of this article and the infobox. The main text states that Harrison co-wrote the song, while the infobox text is in disagreement in this regard. For consistency, Harrison's name should be added to the infobox with an asterisk [or similar] leading to an explanatory note if necessary. (The alternative would be to make it clear in the main text that it is not known definitely whether or not Harrison co-wrote the song; however, that does not seem appropriate as Starr himself has categorically stated that Harrison co-wrote the song.) I know this kind of issue of inconsistency applies to some other songs, so a suitable Wikipedia policy for handling this would be useful.81.152.29.50 (talk) 03:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RSeasy.jpg

Image:RSeasy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Come Easy

How about the story which says that the original pressings of the single had a major misprint, as stated in my headline?

Any truth in that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.224.234 (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an aside...

This song and "Let it Rain", released late 1970 on Eric Clapton's first solo album, sound so much alike in so many ways. Just noticed it.Airproofing (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on It Don't Come Easy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]