Talk:Jalalabad
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jalalabad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
problem...
[edit]The map showing Jalalabad's location is currently off by several provinces. Geo Swan (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Jalalabad is in Nangarhar Province. That's where the point is on the map, right? --MarsRover (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I found it was a render problem. The dot's position remains constant. But changing the size of one's text, or the size of one's image throws it off. Further, when one clicks on the map, to see a more detailed view, the dot disappears. I think the use of this dot mechanism should be deprecated.
- Further, the latitude and longitude on the article Coordinate 34° 31′ 0″ N, 70° 31′ 0″ E Decimal 34.516667°, 70.516667° is clearly incorrect. Jalalabad is supposed to be at the confluence of the two rivers. But maps show the current position in the article as north of the confluence of the rivers. Geo Swan (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- To me the map looks like Jalalabad is in Pakistan. This mapping method has problems, probably due to changing the text size as mentioned above. 220.253.82.122 (talk) 00:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
bpy:-interwiki
[edit]Please, remove any on sight immediately as quickly as possible, this could prevent cross-languages interwiki pollution if done at the time. All these articles in bpy.wiki are dumbbot-created stubs on Indian locations. See Jalalabad (disambiguation) for an explanation why it’s here where these interwiki invade. Thank you. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Mausoleum of Amanullah Khan in Jalalabad.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Mausoleum of Amanullah Khan in Jalalabad.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mausoleum of Amanullah Khan in Jalalabad.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Jalalabad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100830031416/http://www.aisk.org/aisk/NHDAHGTK05.php to http://www.aisk.org/aisk/NHDAHGTK05.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130615060946/http://www.islamicarchitecturedatabase.org/ircica/index2.php?page=Country&id=1 to http://www.islamicarchitecturedatabase.org/ircica/index2.php?page=Country&id=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Mauryan Empire excision
[edit]In November 2014, a long-departed and unmissed editor with strong opinions and a seemingly nationalistic affiliation with the Indian Peninsula, added a large quantity of material about the Mauryan Empire to the article without tying it to the subject of Jalalabad. I've removed it. Tapered (talk) 04:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hottest major city in Afghanistan
[edit]@Wq639: I've re-reverted the edit identifying Jalalabad as the hottest city in the nation. There are two interrelated problems. First, the citation shows no page number to verity the information. Second, the author of the cited work is not a reliable source for climate information concerning Afghanistan—unless she cites a source in her book to confirm the information, which of course would require a page number in the citation. Regards Tapered (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think Tepered is right. There is no compelling reason to put that statement. There are also other hot cities in Afghanistan, including Lashkargah etc. Khestwol (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Tribe living in Jalalabad
[edit]There is no such details about Tribe living in this province. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.205.122 (talk) 10:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Which is it?
[edit]“Occasional suicide attacks by anti-Afghanistan forces often take place.” Either they’re occasional or often. Can’t fix it due to lack of research on my part. But someone who know please do so. mattmidi 23:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdbrown1427 (talk • contribs)
117.5 (48), 120 (49), or somewhere in between?
[edit]Conflicting data from sources; the weatherbox says that the record high is 117.5 F (48 C), but in the text it says 120 F (49 C) is a mean summer maximum, not a record high temperature. Jtadesse (talk) 03:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)