Jump to content

Talk:James Emanuel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Best poets

[edit]

The language "some critics rank him among the best poets of our time" comes directly from the Nebraska Public Radio website here. Please stop removing information with a solid reference to support it.--Alabamaboy (talk) 13:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since that wording comes direct from the NPR page, we should use the NPR language. Olliekamm (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is bizarre that one user should claim that a critic who ranks this poet is obscure, since Wikipedia has multiply referenced information on the critic and his online credits, including some two million or more hits a month. That is hardly obscure by any definition. This suggests to me that the user is a vandal who is simply harassing this page due to personal animus. Vandalism like this should be reported. Lenmatuzak (talk) 19:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. As should all sock-puppets of said critic, if there are any of course. But I suppose any critic that important wouldn't really need to spend his time trying to to wiki himself into relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.240.169 (talk) 23:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Sock puppets are terrible. My own listing: Oliver Kamm, is crawling with them. I see that Alabamaboy is someone of import at Wikipedia. Let's hope he looks into this matter. Immediately! Olliekamm (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to insult anyone, but what the heck is going on here? Everyone who has commented after I posted my initial statement appears to have only one or two edits to their credit or is an anonymous editor. While Wikipedia doesn't discriminate against new or anonymous users, do realize this isn't a simple up or down vote. All that matters is that an article is basing its info on reliable sources, a standard that is being met in this case. Unless someone can show that the citation is misrepresented or not reliable (which is difficult to do when the wording in the article is identical to the cite) then the info must remain here.--Alabamaboy (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

From a french composer/inventor

[edit]
Hello James ! That's character baby ! (Your text)...
It's possible or not, in your article, to read a mention about your work with the composer René-Louis Baron in St Denis (Paris) ? Remember the australian library in the Samson Road... If it's Yes, I prefer you write about that (it's your choice!). If it's Not : He accepts and hunderstand.
Read also about his invention Here... Cordialy --JCAILLAT (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on James Emanuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Emanuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Emanuel&oldid=1201739462"