Talk:Joachim Patinir

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis of a painting

The Analysis of a painting section reads like someone posted their Into to Art History paper. I posted a announcement for now and will look at it more closely soon to see what needs to go and what can stay. Feel free to edit before I get back. --Stomme 15:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although my previous "essay" tag about the analysis of the painting was removed, I think it was still relevant. The text was clearly an interpretive essay of the work. Not bad for beginning art history essay writing, but not really encyclopedic. We don't need to lead into a narrative that slowly reveals the true meaning here. Certainly the removal of "The vivid colors of Patinir’s painting drove my selection of this work, while the intensity really caught my attention" makes it less obvious as such a paper, but It still followed the instructions given by many instructors of art history to discuss the formal qualities—line, color, etc. It goes on to give the wrong definition of repoussoir for this situation and to cite a web museum article that is not a very good source (almost certainly misattributed). Therefore, I rearranged, expanded and edited the write-up. I'm sure there are still some problems, but at least it's not an overly-interpretive mid-level art history essay anymore.--Stomme 17:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's better now, thanks. Johnbod 17:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]