This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1=
I don't really understand what is at issue here. The John Gallagher (basketball coach) article provides references that show Gallagher to be a head men's basketball coach in the America East Conference. There are articles for each of the other eight coaches in the league, so Coach Gallagher would appear to qualify as a notable person by Wikipedia's standards. This is the first article I have posted, and I took pains to be as straightforward and factual as possible. If there are biased or incorrect statements in the article, I would ask for some advice rather than a tag requesting "speedy deletion," since the subject of the article would appear to meet the standards for a Wikipedia page and the content, at least as far as I can tell, is acceptable. Thanks very much! Hartfordathletics (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I based my nomination on the lack of coverage and the lack of independent recognition (national award, hall of fame, national media recognition) per WP:ATH. But if you feel an article can be built based on the guidelines, I'd certainly not object to the article being kept for the time being while you build it up on the basis of those criteria. Figureofnine (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
