Talk:John of Głogów

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Also some mix forms. -- Matthead  Discuß   00:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

  • John is the standard English forename. I see no indication that Jan is more popular in English for this guy than German Johann let alone English John. If the article is right that he came from a family called the Schillings, and from a Germanised area, I'd expect the guy was probably an ethnic German. Is this wrong? If he is not clearly a Slav then we shouldn't push any POV over usage, and the article should be at John of Glogow or some such variant. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 14:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
There have been many Poles with German names, just as there have been many Germans with Polish names. Moreover, this person did not use the surname "Schilling." Nihil novi (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Sure, but that's hardly a good argument that he was an ethnic Slav. If there's a presumption that being born in a territory now Polish, makes one an ethnic Slav (let alone an ethnic Pole), then that's wrong. A guy with his economic background from that region, is probably at least partly German and probably fully Germanised. He can be Polish too of course, but if he's not obviously a primary speaker of a Slavic dialect, then I don't see the necessity for Polonizing his name (when it contradicts English usage). Let me be clear though, I think Slavs from territory now in Poland (whether they were Poles, Silesians, Pommeranians and so on), should have their names Polonised, but is anyone claiming he is one of these guys? :) Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John of Głogów. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)