Talk:Jonathan Biss

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Removal of copyright material

I have removed the entire Career section added by EMIClassics. It is a blatant copyright violation from http://www.intermusica.co.uk/biss. Do not re-add it! I have also re-added the stub tag and the {{primarysources}} tag. Do not remove these tags until these issues have been fully addressed. Voceditenore (talk) 10:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

are not the NYTimes and BBC references sufficient to take down the 3rd party source tag? Pohick2 (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tradition extending to Beethoven

Much though I love Biss, Fleisher, and Schnabel - Beethoven playing doesn't get better than by these three pianists , to my ears! - the idea that Mr. Biss and his great teacher Leon Fleisher are the bearers of a performance tradition extending back to Beethoven is, unfortunately, demonstrably rubbish -as I'm certain Mr. Biss and Mr. Fleisher would fully agree. One need only compare the Beethoven recordings of Theodor Leschetizky's pupils Ignaz Friedman, Jan Ignaz Paderewski, et al, to those of Artur Schnabel (the putative bearer of the tradition)- they could hardly be more different - to recognize that Schnabel did not learn how to interpret Beethoven from his teacher (as Schnabel himself said, too, in case there's any doubt). Moreover, immediately after Beethoven's death, Czerny and Anton Schindler differed radically over just what Beethoven's style of playing was, and both claimed to have it from the horse's mouth. In any case, Schnabel was an extraordinarily original and individual player and certainly does not sound like what Czerny describes in his editions. So - i'm gonna remove that passage - Mr. Biss's Beethoven playing is so great that it doesn't need boosting by any ahistorical claim of "authenticity."

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Biss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303104949/http://www.audaud.com/article.php?ArticleID=3562 to http://www.audaud.com/article.php?ArticleID=3562

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]