Talk:Jonathan I. Schwartz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

24/7 Wall St Reference[edit]

Folks, isn't the 24/7 Wall St reference of "Worst CEO in American History" a tad too harsh considering that the Wall St 24/7 isn't that notable or even has a wikipedia page? I recommend we remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

totally agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Participation Age[edit]


Why was the Wikipedia subject Particpation Age merged with Jonathan Schwartz? This makes no sense. The concept of the Participation Age, while officially coined by Jonathan, and part of Sun Microsystems' marketing message, is not part of Jonathan's identity. Note Cisco Systems has released a very similar marketing message, the Human network, and it does not redirect to John Chambers. Not only that, the founder of Wikipedia endorsed the concept of the Human network on Wikia.

Evidentally the topic is not notable enough to exist on its won to redirects to its most closely linked relation. SGGH speak! 17:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

he resigned[edit] (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

new homepage[edit]

--olhe (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


This guy is notable? Mbstone (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Yep. There's a Wikipedia article about him and everything.--NapoliRoma (talk) 07:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps only as CEO of Sun Microsystems, to which this material could be merged. He doesn't exactly jump out from the List of Sun Microsystems employees. William Avery (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
That's a pretty big "only." I don't see a lot to justify Tim Cook having his own article other than being the CEO of Apple, yet I wouldn't contest it.
Schwartz' tenure at Sun, even prior to his becoming CEO, put him in the news on a regular basis. I think there's enough here to continue to rate a standalone article. The Sun Microsystems article is already plenty long.--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Mbstone – you don't know what you are talking about, or you are trying to insult Jonathan Schwartz. He is obviously notable. gnirre (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)