Talk:José N. Gándara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Puerto Rico (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Damiens edits[edit]

I have reverted the edits becaseu none of them are valid. Discuss here and reach consensus. Mercy11 (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Since Damiens is not answering despite continuing to edit heavily elsewhere, I will assume his offical response is THIS and THIS. Mercy11 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
I wont address his Wp:OWN issue, since I believe it will become a moot point as the discussion goes on. As for specifics of my revert.
1. As for THIS EDIT, the lead is too long: Every article needs a leded, implying that 1 paragraph is too long is way off.
2. As for THIS EDIT, famous: This is a don't care; either way iif fine with me, go ahead remove the word famous if you object to it that badly. It is, however, not a violation of WP:PEACOCK.
3. As for THIS EDIT, removal of the Ponce link from See also: WP:MOS supports this.
4. As for THIS EDIT, CN and SP banners
(4a) CN banner:
Every paragraph has at least one citation, therefore no cites are missing
(4b) SPS banner:
Dr. Gandara has been dead for 50 years, and the publication is from the administration of the public, Commonwealth, government school that bears his name in his honor, as such this is not an SPS. To be exact, the information was reprinted from El Mundo as the article states.
5. As for THIS EDIT, Geocities unreliable and SP: You will have to explain how this is unreliable and self-published. Or take it to WP:RSN. IAE, WP:TAGBOMBing and being WP:POINTy, as you did, "is highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban".
6. As for THIS EDIT, one of Ponce's greatest physicians.: If the phrase bothers you and your preference is to risk text copyright violation by using the exact same words as those used by the citation, go ahead and knock yourself out, but I don';t support it.
7. As for THIS EDIT, article citation format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"
8. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation: Changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.
9. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation (again): Again, changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.
10. As for THIS EDIT, changing a title name: By your own admission you did not know the title name, so you speculated in changing it. WP:OR
11. As for THIS EDIT, proper page title spelling - after guessing: If you are not proficient in Spanish, you should not venture by guessing. This should had been an undo rather than to continue guessing.
12. As for THIS EDIT, format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"
13. As for THIS EDIT, lumping 3 banners together: This would had been a moot point if you had tageed it with one 1 banner to begin with.
Regards, please discuss objections here instead of reverting. Reverting can get you blocked from editing this and other articles. Mercy11 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José N. Gándara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)