Talk:Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Supreme Court cases Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Fourteenth Amendment?

Are you sure that it shouldn't be the First? Can someone look into this? ColinKennedy 22:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. JayW 00:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The First Amendment directly applies only to the federal government, but the Fourteenth Amendment is deemed to apply its requirements to the states.

Who the hell is Wilson?

Seriously- it's not mentioned in the article at all. -216.221.33.60 (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Full name of the case is Joseph Burstyn, Incorporated v. Wilson, Commissioner of Education of New York, et al.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burstyn article

Given the significance of this case to debates about censorship in the United States, Burstyn needs an article of his own. I'll see what I can do about this...

Calibanu (talk) 05:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)User Calibanu[reply]

Paris Theater, not city.

"Paris" should refer to the Paris Theater in New York City which screened the film, not to the city in France.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]