Talk:Joseph Johnson (publisher)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Joseph Johnson (publisher) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 21, 2011.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 2, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
December 5, 2007 Peer review Reviewed
January 22, 2008 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia (Rated FA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Christianity / Unitarian Universalism (Rated FA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Unitarian Universalism work group.
 

"Antinomy" or "Antimony"?[edit]

Either "Antinomy" or "Antimony" is plausible. It would be comforting to decorate it (whichever is correct) with a "sic". John W. Kennedy (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for discovering this all-too-easily-overlooked typo! NSH001 changed it to "Antimony", which is consistent with the OpenLibrary listing for Millar's book. It's also consistent with the sentence itself; antimonials were recognized medicines, cf. the quote from Oliver Twist on its Wikipedia article. Willow (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)