This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Is it a BLP violation not to include "alleged" before "light sentencing"? Can we discuss this instead of warring over it? Sro23 (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we should re-word it, it is factually a 'light sentence' compared to what the jury recommended (16 years in prison vs 5 years of probation/400 hours community service/$500 fine), which seems to have been at least a part of the cause of outrage. FT 1339 (talk) 08:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FT 1339: I know this is an old comment, but in case you're still around: Going by Talk:Killing of Latasha Harlins, there doesn't seem to be any sources presented so far establishing a jury recommendation. If you have such sources, it would be great if you could present them. They would be useful for the other article if not this one. Nil Einne (talk) 10:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why isn't Karlin's Jewish heritage noted here? Wikipedia articles mention heritage all the time and classifies individuals as such all the time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.61.255.230 (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We only do so when there are sources establishing it's of sufficient relevance. If you have such sources, present them and we can add it. Per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS you should take care when comparing to other articles, partially because each case is different so the circumstances especially the sources need to be consider. But also because we have plenty of articles which do stuff they shouldn't. Nil Einne (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While the sources used do claim no jail time, is this accurate? Killing of Latasha Harlins claims Du was sentence to time served. Unfortunately the sources are too unreliable for me to be willing to copy them to here, but it sounds fairly plausible. Time served may be no additional jail time, but I'm not sure if "no jail time" is accurate. For example, if she spent 12 months in jail awaiting her trial, conviction and sentencing, I assume this would be counted as serving a custodial sentence of a year. By comparison, if someone is acquitted or they receive no custodial sentence not even time served, they would have no jail sentence and for example could accurately say they have never served a custodial sentence as the time spent awaiting trial isn't counted. BTW, I chose the 12 months thing for a reason as in some countries it's the threshold where it would prevent any visa on character grounds especially if a recent conviction, to demonstrate it's not simply a distinction without a difference. Nil Einne (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
