Jump to content

Talk:Julius Tomin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recent removal of material

[edit]

Hi Lareve, could you say what your objection is to this material? Many thanks, SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 14:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed inaccuracies: Julius was not involved with the Jan Hus Foundation, and he was not in a psychiatric hospital for 2 years. Plus I don't think references to his children's names should be on the internet.Lareve (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He was involved with the work of the Foundation, in the sense that it was set up to help him, and revolved around him to begin with. The children's names were already in online sources, which is where I found them, but I've removed them anyway. The source for the psychiatric hospital is John Pilger, here, third paragraph, second sentence. The implication is that he was sent there because he refused to do military service. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 14:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I'm finding more details in Barbara Day's The Velvet Philosophers, so I'll read that for a bit, then add some of it to the article. That might help to resolve things. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 14:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've edited it a little so that Day is the main source now. Let me know if you feel that's a more accurate summary, bearing in mind that we can only publish what has already been published elsewhere. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 15:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is better although Day is not wholly accurate.Lareve (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you can direct me to the most accurate sources you're aware of, I'd be willing to try to use them, so long as they're what we call reliable sources. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 16:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will do asap.Lareve (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tomin on his wiki entry

[edit]

He has penned a criticism of this entry on his webpage, see [1]. It seems to me like he's more upset about the entry's omissions rather than its inclusions. --Eisfbnore talk 10:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]