Talk:June List

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Problems with article

This article is really bad. It is not at all similar to the article in the swedish wiki. The article says that the June list allied with other parties in IND/DEM, wich is not true. June list has often critizised the other parties and later succeeded in forcing the POlish family party and Lega Nord to leave Ind/Dem. The article mentions very little about the role the June list playes in current politics in sweden. It is not up to date. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.113.247.200 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Now it is significantly better... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.113.247.212 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

If the June List is in the Ind/Dem group then it is clear that it is allied to the other parties in the group. The previous comment shows a failure to understand the group system. Or is it just the comment of someone who is embarrassed by the June List's asssociates?

Being a member of IND/DEM is a must for the June list. That is the only way the party can get any money and access to printing facilities... The June list had to join IND/DEM, despite the other "problematic" parties in that group. The June List and especially Nils Lundgern himself has many times argued against and protested about the policies of Lega Nord and UK Independence party, the polish family party and so on. Nils Lundgren was personally attacked by neonazis in Gotland during the 2006 election campaign. There is no cooperation between the different parties in IND/DEM. The June List only has some connections with the Danish June Movement, for obvious reasons. In 2006 the June List explored the possibility to join the green group instead. The problems was largely solved when the June List and others managed to force Lega Nord to leave IND/DEM.

Sven hagströmer is no longer in the board of the party. That sentence should be removed.

Fair use rationale for Image:Junilistan.svg

Image:Junilistan.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on June List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]