Talk:Junkers Jumo 223

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

I wanted to ad a photo of the Jumo 223, but the process is ways too complicated for me.I already wasted half an hour. I keep the photo on my hard disk, if someone is courageous enough to post it here. --Dovatf (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Junkers Jumo 223. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How many engines built?

As the article currently stands it says (with no reference) that only one engine was built. Yet the Hugo Junkers site linked at the bottom says that eight engines were built http://www.hugojunkers.bplaced.net/junkers-jumo-223.html . Any idea which is correct?

Jpmaytum (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why rhomboid rather than square?

A figure with four equal sides and four equal angles is not a rhomboid: it is a special case of a rhombus, most often called a square. All the pictures I have seen of the Jumo 223 seem to show right angles between adjacent banks - have I been fooled? 84.64.252.217 (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you are correct. But many (most?) people think of a square as sitting flat on the ground looking like an × from the front rather than sitting balanced on one bank looking like a + . Stepho talk 05:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]