This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Spiritus-temporis.com is known to be a mirror of Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Stu#Spiritus-Temporis. There is also evidence of natural evolution here. See this edit, where we begin to see the influx of this content. Several days later, another editor fixes up spelling and formatting errors ([1]). These are correct in the mirror. It is unlikely that the first contributor would have introduced the errors before copying the content onto Wikipedia. While it's always good to investigation potential copyright issues - and much appreciated when editors keep an eye out for this - in this case, the copying seems to be reversed. Lacking additional, plausible evidence that they had it first, we must presume the content evolved naturally here. --Moonriddengirl(talk)14:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
