Talk:KDU-ČSL

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Vandal removed links to common Czech word. 71.99.139.97

You are vandal. You know very good, that this is very vulgar abuse. --Cinik 02:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you, please, start using English language? Or ask somone to translate your text. You don't make a bit sense. There is nothing vulgar there. Common usage. Don't try to enforce thought police here. This is FREE Encyclopedia. I am not vandal. You have no idea what that word, besides others, means. 71.99.139.97

This page is constantly vandalized and POVized by members of the Czechoslovak People's Party. The page is written under strong POV - collaboration with communists and participation on the totalitarian communist regime is belittled and any critical information is censored. (--Kyknos 14:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Question of Černoprdelness

The popular term 'černoprdelníci' (constantly removed from this article by some vandals) is not only commonly used by opponents of the party, but its existence is also acknowledged by the leaders of the KDU-ČSL party itself. It is even mentioned at the official web of the party in a interview with its vice-chairman:

An answer by Roman Línek (the first vicechairman of KDU-ČSL) (from http://www.kdu.cz/default.asp?page=311&IDCl=18163&IDR=130 (the official web of the KDU-ČSL party)).

Czech original:

OTÁZKA (Máňa z Horní Lhoty)

Proč se lidovcům hanlivě říká černoprdelníci? A nevadí vám to?

ODPOVĚĎ (12.12.2006 10:56)

V jednom svém interním proslovu na stranickém jednání jsem použil výraz, že KDU-ČSL by prospělo "odčernoprdelnění" protože to je nám neprávem setrvačně dávaná nálepka. Věřím, že tento přívlastek do budoucích měsíců a let ve vztahu k nám přestane být používán. Také jsem přesvědčen, že větší otevřenost a určitý "upgrade" naší straně prospěje.

English ranslation:

QUESTION (Máňa from Horní Lhota)

Why are 'lidovci' (members of the KDU-ČSL) pejorativelly called 'černoprdelníci'? Dont't you mind?

ANSWER (12.12.2006 10:56)

In an internal speech at a party conference, I have said that KDU-ČSL would benefit from 'odčernoprdelnění' (= "dečernoprdelization" or "removing of 'černoprdel(níci)'-ness"), because this epithet is wrongfully persistently attributed to us. I believe that this epithet would cease from usage in connection with us in future months and years. I also belive that our party will benefit from greater frankness and a certain "upgrade".

Fair use rationale for Image:Kducsl logo.PNG

Image:Kducsl logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christian and Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People's Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050304101213/http://www.kdu.cz/ to http://www.kdu.cz/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050131171847/http://zahranicni.kdu.cz/ to http://zahranicni.kdu.cz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]