Talk:Kaggle

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Why was Jeremy Howard removed as President and keypeople?

During this revision, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kaggle&oldid=1164502572, @Lumimous Person has removed Jeremy Howard as a keyperson and first President of Kaggle Inc.

According this wired article (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/the-exabyte-revolution), you see clear proof of Jeremy's contribution to Kaggle Inc.

Any reason why this has been removed? – NirvanaToday^t@lk 01:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant thread on twitter by Jeremy linked here https://twitter.com/jeremyphoward/status/1707879546568229117 Atriple3clerk (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nirvanatoday: Hello, it was based on the source that I had used when I was trying to fact check the article, since it was largely unsourced. If you can find a reliable source that mentions him, feel free to add it back. I had no malicious intent. ⇒ Luminous Person (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting valuable information without any discussion on the Talk page is a bad practice in my opinion. Also, we are talking about the two people who founded the company. Please refer to the link I posted. I'll make the necessary changes. Just wanted to check with you before doing so. – NirvanaToday^t@lk 04:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Official Kaggle Twitter links to post calling him one of the cofounders https://x.com/kaggle/status/162598716698673153?s=46 Hyperzx (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why was he added as a founder? I see no record of that anywhere. The cited source gives no indication of this. All I'm seeing is that he was a former president. ZacharyWalkerPinto (talk)

The edit of Nirvanatoday is such a blunder that people on Twitter (e.g. https://x.com/karpathy/status/1708150715401846924?s=20) are using this case to point out to Wikipedia's decline in quality ("10x"). For proof of him being a cofounder you can refer to this lawsuit: https://casetext.com/case/howard-v-goldbloom. I will restore him as cofounder for any future change please refer to the lawsuit above which gives plenty of proof.Hitsugaya-kun (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]