This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
First of all this is a BLP article so exercising an utmost caution is recommended in general. Despite that I'm seeing quite a few weasel phrasings in the article that are not only not encyclopedic, but also unsourced. Some examples: "Gustad's third film (...) was again 'experimental.'", "It was alleged that", "It was also alleged", "one of the crew told the truth to the police" (yeah, THE TRUTH AND ONLY THE TRUTH!!!!), "The problem was his inexperience", "it failed to make any impact" etcetc. I think that there are so many allegations, hearsays and unconfirmed rumors in this article (backed by God knows how many dubious articles) that I'll be removing a lot of the unsourced content. In general it would be awesome if this tabloid-style article would read much more encyclopedic. -- CoolKoon (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
