Talk:Kaligandaki Corridor

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Asia Future‑class Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Future	This article has been rated as Future-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian Highways Task Force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

On 5 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to National Highway 48 (Nepal). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 5 June 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaligandaki Corridor → National Highway 48 (Nepal) – reason:according to the Statistics of National Highway Network, road names has been moved to road numbers. See SNH2020-21 👤Raju💌 11:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:OFFICIAL and potentially WP:COMMONNAME (given there has been no evidence presented yet to go against such a claim.) No opposition to the proposed name becoming a redirect towards the current title though. Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.