Talk:Kampfgeschwader 100

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kampfgeschwader 100 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Recent edit

I restored the prior version of the article (diff), as the edit reintroduced uncited material and removed the maintenance template. Please see WP:BURDEN.

Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit. Please don't edit articles that you have no knowledge on. It is a mark of ignorance to call every mission, or sortie (another word you seem to have a problem with), "a bombing". Dapi89 (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate removal of maint tag; re-insertion of dubious links

Please see Inappropriate removal of maint tag; re-insertion of dubious links. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see explanation in the edit summary: "rm dubious links from ext links; link to de.wiki from see also; restore maint tag; rm uncited intricate detail". If you don't understand the edit summary, please ask before reverting. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate removal of maint tag

Please do not remove the tags before addressing the issues. In addition, links to other wiki projects are not included in "See also". The edit also reinstated uncited material (dff) that has been challenged and removed. The restoration of this material was done in violation of WP:BURDEN and is against policy. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pathfinders in the Blitz

I seem to recall KG100 being the unit that use Xgerat and Ygerat in the pathfinder role during The Blitz. This is mentioned prominently in Most Secret War and other places. Is this some other unit? Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see the missing "r". Hatnotes added. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]