This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Karl Friedrich Becker/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
==Rating explanation==
This article meets all the guidelines for B. It shares the weakness of the article in DE: only based on one source, but that one source seems to pretty much duplicate what ADB has to say with more clarity. I think it strengthened that article by omitting some POV material. I rate it as high in importance since Becker's work is well known, at least historically. I'm not sure how well known he is known now in German encyclopaedias. It does not seem to be a stub to me because I don't think there is a lot more to be said based on what I've seen in German references. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 17:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 20:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
