Talk:Katie King (spirit)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Paranormal (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Women's History (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Title[edit]

It seems rather odd to have Katie King (spirit) as the title and Florence Cook as the redirect. Since Cook indisputably existed and there is a signficant literature about her, while King is discussed only as an emanation of Cook, it seems that Florence Cook is the appropriate subject of the article. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

The reason is that Katie appeared for others, too--not just Florence Cook (it's in the article).--Anthon.Eff (talk) 02:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
I should have written "mainly" rather than "only". Cusop Dingle (talk) 07:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katie King (spirit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

quality of the article compared to the french one[edit]

i am native french speaker , but regardless browse usually more english version of articles because in most cases it seems way more complete. this seems to be the only time i recall the english version being shorter than the french one, if u take of the equation every obvious case where the french version would be more complete (whatever french topic..).

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Cook — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.51.20.36 (talk) 01:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)