Jump to content

Talk:Ken Schles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Organization: general comments

[edit]

The main issue with this article is one of organization. It lacks the conventional sections one would expect, such as education, career, a list of key works, critical reception, and so forth.Aolivex (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balance

[edit]

This article is dominated by long credits lists. Nevertheless, it is very well-cited. Could those sources furnish narrative information about his biography, career, critical reception, etc? Its is exceedingly thin on these key topics. By contrast the lists are very long, but they lack context. How can any artist have 122 "major" works and projects? It would be more helpful to have a few key works isolated for in-depth discussion and the rest organized in a table - or struck altogether. Aolivex (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

Since this is a topic on a visual artist, it would be greatly enhanced with some images illustrating Schles' key works or a portrait of the artist himself.Aolivex (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ken Schles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]