Talk:Kendall Drive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 23:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kendall DriveFlorida State Road 94 – Article's primary topic is about Florida State Road 94; designation of thus provides notability to Kendall Drive name Relisted BDD (talk) 21:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC) DyluckTRocket (talk) 13:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Oppose per WP:UCN, discussion below, discussion at a related RM at Talk:Bird Road, and because a title does not confer notability. —  AjaxSmack  03:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The number designations do not cover the entirety of the roads in question. This articles could be considered in compliance with WP:USRD/NT#Combined articles instead, where, for example, the numbered segment of Kendall Drive and the non-numbered segment "are so tightly related that it would be difficult to write non-redundant articles about each". Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
  • The nominator's explanation doesn't do anything to explain why the article should be moved. How the road gets its notability is irrelevant; the questions are, is it notable (yes), and what do reliable sources tend to call the road? Powers T 13:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • As shown by sources in the article, the road is called either North Kendall Drive or just Kendall Drive. The State Road designation name, while not applying to the entire length of the road, is a neutral compromise. -DyluckTRocket (talk) 03:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • If sources don't call it "Florida State Road 94", why should we? bobrayner (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • That doesn't answer the question either. How can "Florida State Road 94" be a "neutral compromise" between two names that are very similar to each other but very different from the "compromise"? And that's ignoring the fact that the article appears to be about the entire road and not just the portion designated with the state highway number. Now, if you wanted to refactor the article to be about the state highway designation, rather than about the road, then the proposed title would probably be better. Powers T 00:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • For what its worth, up until November 2012, there were two separate articles (SR 94 and this one) describing this stretch of road. I did not perform the merge, but I think it was done because Kendall Drive (the road) was longer than SR 94. –Fredddie 02:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bird Road which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kendall Drive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]