Jump to content

Talk:Kepler-11c

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleKepler-11c has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starKepler-11c is part of the Kepler-11 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2011Good article nomineeListed
May 31, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 31, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the orbits of exoplanets Kepler-11b, Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, and Kepler-11f (artist's depiction pictured) can fit within the orbit of Mercury?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-11c/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nergaal (talk) 22:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • " and is most likely a water planet with a thin hydrogen-helium atmosphere" needs a citation
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "its five sister planets formed the first discovered system with more than three planets." same issue as the b one; not accurate
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


  • "The Kepler-11 system is the first known to host more than three planets" see above
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Follow-up observations were conducted by facilities in California, Arizona, Hawaii, Texas and the Canary Islands." please expand
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • why is "Host star" so different from the b one? "With an apparent magnitude of 14.2, Kepler-11 cannot be seen from Earth with the naked eye" is this notable here and not in teh b one?
 Done Section added to Kepler-11b as well. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a mass of 13.5 ME and a radius or 3.15 RE" same as for b. please add certainty intervals to be rigurous and not misleading
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "grams/cc" is not a common scientific notation
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "over 3.27 times hotter than the equivalent measurement for Earth" not necessary to have 3 sig figs here. and just say over three times than the average temperature on earth
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "he inclination of Kepler-11c is 89º, and is thus almost edge-on as seen from Earth" super interesting: how was the inclidnation determined for something so far away? also say that this is similar to Uranus
  • How does the density compare to the gas giants in the Solar System?
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • again, add an comparative sizes image for the system
 Done --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nergaal (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-11c. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]