Talk:King's Cross railway accident

Trains: in UK / in London / Operations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in London may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Coaches

To work in: According to Wilson, the 2nd coach from the rear was TK 12615. According to Harris (p.131), this was built York 1928 to dia. 115, order 277 (on 1928/9 CBP), originally numbered 5606. 8-compt, 64 seats 61'6"x9'3". --Redrose64 (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Events

According to this reference [1] the last coach was derailed, and overturned, when the signalman changed the points in an attempt to divert the train into an empty platform. It did not collide with the second train. Biscuittin (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derailed and overturned yes, but follow the link from that to the PDF file for the full text of the official inquiry; see particularly the plan on the last page, and also the last sentence of page 2 para. 2. I give three other references for my statement:

[10] Cooke 1958, p. 512. "the Leeds train came into collision with these coaches"
[11] The Railway Magazine 1945, p. 176. "the rear coaches collided with the 7 p.m. Aberdonian"
[12] Bonavia 1985, p. 36. "the coaches collided with the front of the 7 pm 'Aberdonian'"

Remember, unfortunate as it may seem, we describe what is WP:VERIFIABLE, which is not necessarily the truth. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]