Jump to content

Talk:Kiowa language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does "J" really represent a "T" sound?

[edit]

If so, is this the result of some phonetic shift? Had they run out of other letters of the Latin alphabet? (but I see that some digraphs TH and CH are used). On the face of it, this seems a bizarre choice. Grover cleveland (talk) 06:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is eccentric, but obviously McKenzie tried to avoid digraphs as well as he could, but didn't quite succeed. At least this way, no letter of the set abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz, which can be written on virtually any typewriter (OK – apart from those pesky Russian typewriters, but who still uses those?) and any computer keyboard out there (as far as I'm aware, all computer layouts include an easy way to type this set), went unused. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. This is part of Parker McKenzie's orthography. He designed it so he could use a standard typewriter to communicate in Kiowa with his friends and associates. Daniel Harbour and Laurel Watkins have a nice paper explaining how McKenzie's orthography was highly linguistically informed and essentially ideal for the purposes for which it was designed when he designed it.
There is no phonetic shift involved in this. The letter J represents a specific sound in Kiowa. It is absolutely not the English letter J. Xj (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kiowa language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]