Talk:Kurdish Christians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

INFORMATION[edit]

Someone add more info to the topic

There are many followers in Ranye. Thanks. Ermanos 15:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followers of Jesus?[edit]

I changed followers of Jesus to "Christians" (as ip forgot to log in) because it seemed more proper and the wording of the article sounded like a brochure missionaries would hand out at a church to get donations. I believe this to be the most non-biased way of phrasing this ChrisLamb 19:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiridates III Not Kurdish[edit]

Most scholarship considers Tiridates III to be of Parthian and/or Armenian descent. He was a king of Arsacid Armenia. Making the claim using only a couple sources that he was an ethnic Kurd seems to be cherrypicking, considering that there are hundreds of other sources that consider him an Armenian or Parthian.

https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/tiridates-iii-armenian-king

https://www.ancient.eu/Tiridates_I_of_Armenia/

https://gw.geneanet.org/comrade28?lang=en&n=armenia&oc=0&p=king+tiridates+iv+of

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Arsacid_Dynasty_of_Armenia

Thank you for taking notice. I removed mention of Theophobos as well. The utter vast majority reliable sources consider him Iranian, not Kurdish (see also; [1]). Removed some WP:OR as well and added proper references for the at least partial Kurdish origin of the Armenian-Georgian Zakarids–Mkhargrdzeli. Whoever added them to the page, did not adhere to WP:NPOV vis-a-vis their origins. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

I removed the POV check which at the time it was added was required. However i believe the main problem with the article was refering to Christians as "Folowers of Jesus" which i corrected (see above) if anyoe disagrees please feel free to add in the pov check once again and explain. ChrisLamb 18:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After re-reading the article and reading the discussion below I believe a POV check is probably in order, however before I repost it would be great to have some consenus on this ChrisLamb 19:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think yes we need POV check since the article is still POV.--Aziz1005 19:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree. Even if 1000 Kurds have converted as stated in the article below, to claim In recent years there has been a growing number of Muslim background Kurds who have converted to Christianity is simply blowing things out of proportion. Lets keep in mind the Kurds are a nation of 25+ million people! And I have never heard of a Christian Kurd in Turkey, Iran, Armenia as the article currently claims. Chaldean 20:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)…[reply]
Ok the POV check is back ChrisLamb 20:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The statement in question is bad as per WP:WEASEL. Weather you (Chaldean) hear about something or not is irrelevant, you are not a reliable source. :) -- Cat chi? 20:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Muslim Kurds conversion[edit]

The source here does not indicate any thing about Muslim Kurds who have converted to Christianity whatsoever so please remove it or place it with another source (if found).since it’s POV to say In recent years there has been a growing number of Muslim background Kurds who have converted to Christianity with out proving that. According to my knowledge most people who are referred in the article as Kurdish Christians are in fact Assyrians who inhabited that region thousands years ago and established most of those cities in northern Iraq such as Irbil,Ankawa and Aqra.--Aziz1005 18:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aziz, I do agree with you, the article is kinda blowing things out of proportion. Yes Kurds have converted since 2003, but its not as big as the article is making it out to be. I dont read Arabic fully, so maybe you can skim through some of these articles and have a more accurate picture of the story in Wiki's article. [[2]] Chaldean 18:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yea the article estimated around 1000 Muslim Kurds have converted to Christianity during the past seven years and most of them or all of them converted to Protestantism and established a new church called the Kurdish church in Irbil. However, these figures are estimation and not totally accurate (The article says). Also it says those new Christians face prosecution or discrimination from the Kurdish society.
Around 300 new Christians of Ranye (in another part it says around 75 to 100) tried to open a new church in their city but the local authorities refused to give them the permission. Also the article mentioned that some of the new Christians converted back to Islam after few years because they were getting paid to convert to Christianity or because they were not satisfied with their new religion. In general, the article says the spread of Christianity among Muslim Kurds is slow and limited.--Aziz1005 18:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please, don't turn this into an ethnic feud. Kurdish converts to Christianity have already established new churches in Hawler (Arbil). Look for Kurdzman Church of Christ. These people need all the help they can get from their Christian fellows like Chaldean. Cheers. Heja Helweda 05:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While you certianly have cleaned up the history part the part about muslim kurdish conversion is still a little ify considering that all the sources appear to be from a site devoted to missions in Kurdistan which make its facts a little suspect, also there are several words that are undefined such as "significant" that should be given a number, and because of these reasons I still believe a POV check is in order. ChrisLamb 13:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the POV template to this article since it appears it is no longer unanimously thought that this article is POV ChrisLamb 20:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Heja it is not a matter of an ethnic feud.we are just discussing the issue ....end of the story. The last part is still POV which contains words such as significant..etc I think the article is shownig improvement but we need more edits to make it NPOV.Also if you can provide more references.Thanks--Aziz1005 23:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Word Significant removed. What else?Heja Helweda 01:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
even though you replaced significant with a number it would probably be better to have an actual number (or rough estimate)also I think the article might be improved if there were sources other than a website devoted to missions in kurdistan (the mission sites should be kept for now but it would give the article more credibility if there were independent sources) ChrisLamb 01:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree withyou ChrisLamb --Aziz1005 12:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christians in Kurdistan[edit]

I met a Kurd in the USA, he said he was christian. However, he wasn't a convert? (or maybe he didn't want to tell me that). Is their certain regions in Kurdistan that had historic presence of Christians? (the article mainly talks about the conversions), which is confusing. All in all does anyone know the total population of the Kurdish Christians?--Skatewalk 02:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV Check for Contemporary Kurdish Christians(9/27/07)[edit]

The wording of many phrases in the Contemporary Kurdish Christians section (especially those referring to Islam or Muslims)is extremely POV and needs to be reviewed by the community. Also while more actual numbers have been added since the last time this was discussed the section about Muslim conversion to Christianity is still ambiguous when it talks about converts. ChrisLamb 22:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ali is a convert to Christianity, check out his article before putting useless tags.Heja Helweda 04:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kurdzman Church of Christ.jpg[edit]

Image:Kurdzman Church of Christ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Late Medieval Kurdish Christians[edit]

I remember once I was reading a medieval era book which was about visit of the German physician Leonhard Rauwolff through Kurdistan. According to the book, the majority of the Kurds were Christians or more accurately according to the book Nestorians. I cannot say wether he is right or not when saying majority of Kurds are Nestorians, but at least it gives us the information that there was significant numbers of Christian Kurds at least up to the 16th century. Peshéw (talk) 21:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No your mixing things up. Nestorian Christians in what is "Kurdistan" were actually Assyrians. Kurds have never been Nestorians. Chaldean (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not mixing things up! He mentions in his book Assyria, Babylonia, Chaldea, Media, Mesopotamia, Parthians and seems to have a good knowledge of history of the region. He says ...Kurds who live in Kurdistan province of Ottoman empire, which lies between Media and Mesopotamia alongside Tigris. ...are the same people who harrassed Xenophon and his men... I don't see he is talking about Assyrians of Kurdistan. Peshéw (talk) 08:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Christians of what Church were they? Chaldean (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He says most of them are Nestorians. Peshéw (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That I know for a fact that is not true. Kurds have never been Nestorians. But you can ask User:Garzo himself about it, since his very educated about the issue. Chaldean (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article already reads traditionally Christian Kurds were Nestorian. Indeed there are numerous books by travellers or reaserchers who visited Kurdistan and mention Kurdish Christians, But the one I'm talking about is notable for some reasons; one is the date of the book which is relatively old. another reason is the witness is not talking about some Kurds or a minority of Kurds. One gets the impression that as if much of Kurdish population is a recent convert to Islam under local Muslim-Kurdish emirates, probably towards the last centuies of Ottoman period. I welcome comments by Garzo. Peshéw (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I'm trying to tell you: in old/historic books and even today, scholars make the mistake of calling Assyrians "Kurdish Christians". Here is a perfect example: [[3]] - this guy and his village is wrongly labelled Kurdish, since he is really Assyrian. Chaldean (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of the confusion which exists between Kurdish Nestorians and Semitic Nestorians reflected in some sources. But is Assyrian a Persian-like language with Arabic and Chaldean lown-words? (answer: of course not) Isn't that tongue Kurdish? Peshéw (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pêşewe, I don't agree with your conjecture. There is no evidence about the claim that Nestorians were Kurds or vice versa. The only thing that I have read is that they usd to live side by side as neighbors. Nestorians have their own distinct history, language and ethnicity. This article deals strictly with Kurdish Christians not Nestorians or Assyrians.Heja Helweda (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heja, Nestorian is NOT an ethnic designation, it was only name of a religious sect in Kurdistan, who included both Iranians (Kurds) and Semitics (Aramaic-speakings). To this day there are sizable numbers of Kurds who bear the title of Nestori. examples can be found among the Mukri Kurds. Peshéw (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am NOT aware of any documnets about Kurdish Nestorians, I would be grateful if you show me references in that regard. Until then, it just remains as an unproven claim. Sorry about the strict tone, but we have to be careful not to mix rumours with serious academic work.Heja Helweda (talk) 23:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean reference to Leonhard Rauwolf? Peshéw (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From "The Travels Of Marco Polo":

In the mountainous parts there is a race of people named Kurds, some of whom are Christians of the Nestorian and Jakobite sects and others Mahometans(muslim).

That's a proof that a large part of the Kurds were Nestorians/Jakobites. Why the hell would he call them Kurds and not Assyrians if they were actually Assyrians? He also mention that there was non-Kurdish Nestorians/Jakobites, who probably are the ancestors of today's "Assyrians". Why didnt the Aramaic-speaking Christians in Middle East start call themselves "Assyrians", "Chaldeans" or "Arameans" until 20th century? Btw I'm aware of that Marco Polo had some lesser nice things to say about Kurds but that hasn't anything to do with this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.80.98 (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Distinguish between Assyrians and Kurds; Assyrians are not Kurds[edit]

Why is this article portraying Assyrians as Kurdish Christians? — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 00:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such claim in the article. Assyrians/Chaldeans are a separate ethnic group with a very long and often tragic history. They have been persecuted for centuries by their muslim neighbors, and they truly deserve justice.Heja Helweda (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article makes no effort to distinguish Assyrians from Kurdish Christians. If no effort is taken to do that, I shall do that in order to put the article into neutrality. ܐܵܬܘܿܪܵܝܵܐ 16:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged three different sections of this talk page that essentially dealt with the same issue; that which is stated in the headline of this section. The below changes done by myself were primarily made in an effort to remove parts of the article that conferred a Kurdish identity to, amongst other, Assyrian people residing in the same region.81.229.176.77 (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I made some changes to the article and commented these in the talk page. I realize I ventured into a rather lenghty explanation for these changes, so I've deleted my previous comments and I'm writing this to summarize what message I intended to convey.
The sections of the article that I changed, by removing them, were not adhering to two of Wikipedia’s core content policies; "No original research" and "Verifiability".
The first text I removed was one that mentioned various denominations of Christians in the intro of the article. While this article purports to describe ethnic Kurdish Christians, the denominations listed were taken from a source that in itself did not specifically talk about churches that ethnic Kurdish Christians belong to; it was simply mentioning the existence of Christians in the region governed by the KRG in Iraq, regardless of what ethnic identity these people endorse themselves.
The second text I removed mentioned that in the 19th century there were Christians speaking only Kurdish and Muslim Kurdish tribes who claimed a Christian ancestry. These statements were sourced but in themselves they aren't directly relevant to this article since the source once again doesn't specify the ethnicity of the people mentioned. What language people speak doesn't necessarily indicate what ethnic identity they endorse, and change of religion might also involve the loss of one’s original culture and by extension result in a change of ethnic identity.
The third text I removed was one that ventured to state an estimate of the current number of Kurdish Christians while not including any source for such a supposition.
81.229.176.77 (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of Kurds in Early Christianity[edit]

There was no mention of Kurds/Kurdistan until the late middle ages let alone fantastic stories of st. Andrew preaching among the "Kurds". The "Kurdish Kingdom" mentioned by a certain Coptic preacher is probably either Osroene or Adiabene, which were both Aramaic speaking kingdoms. I am adding a POV tag for now.--Rafy talk 03:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Acts of Martyrs translated by Paul Bedjan refers to early Christianity in Qardu, a region which according to the EOI vol.5 p.448 was probably populated by Semitic speaking peoples who might have been later partly assimilated by Kurds. Coptic source talks about Kurdistan and not Kurds.--Rafy talk 00:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The regional designation Qardu shouldn't be presumed to be synonymous with the term Kurdistan, since there is no conclusive research that demonstrates such a link.81.229.176.77 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Royal Aremian Zakarid family as kurdish family[edit]

Refer to original sources (there are plenty of 12-15th century original manuscript in Matenadaran that classify this claim as a joke). Basing such claims on hypothesis of couple of 20th century historians with no reference to original sources suggesting that the grand, grand, grandfather of Ivane and Zakare may have had kurdish origin (though kurds aren't met/known in original Armenian (or any other writen language) sources(manuscripts) prior to way after late middle ages), is ridicilous. In addition there is no single original source, nor a source with reference to original one suggesting that they where converted to christianity. They have been christians as far as their history goes. Only documented religious conversion concerning Zakarids was conversion of younger of the brothers, Ivane, from Armenian Apostolic to greek Orthodoxy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayordi (talk • contribs) 21:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


News Ortodox Kurds[edit]

According to news (http://rudaw.net/kurmanci/people-places/220220151) it is said there is a big group. Thanks Anton.aldemir (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kurdish Christians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kurdish Christians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kurdish_Christians&oldid=1206131381"