Talk:Labyrinth (marble game)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Linking here.[edit]

Damn, this page is almost orphan. No real article links here. Yet there are many games similar to it. Why are they not linking? I am going to throw an orphan template on this article. --Svip ^pong 12:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 February 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 21:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Labyrinth (game) → Labyrinth (marble game) – to free up this page as a disambig for other games sharing the name, or possibly to redirect to Labyrinth_(disambiguation)#Gaming which lists them. Even if this was the first game with the title it's not necessarily the most notable one. The vast number of video games alone which paint stories and universes are ones a lot of people are going to be interested in. Particularly with the passing of David Bowie and renewed interest in the film. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support there is also an article about a board game called labyrinth.--67.68.21.106 (talk) 01:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support the current title should redirect to the disambiguation page. There's also labyrinths (mazes) which people walk through. -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 04:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the nominator's rationale, given the number of other notable games. ╠╣uw [talk] 10:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.