Talk:Lady chapel

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvement

St. Patrick's Cathedral in NYC has a Lady Chapel.

https://www.saintpatrickscathedral.org/

I think this article needs to be expanded. Surely there is a rich history behind Mary Chapels? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There must be a reason for the second chapel within the church, which is already a place of worship. I know basically nothing about churches, cathedrals, chapels, or Catholicism, but I can see that this could be a much more interesting article if someone who knew a little more about these things were to help out with this page. I think it could also use a redirect from "Ladies' Chapel," but I don't know how to add one. Some help here? Craeburn (talk) 19:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just need to type "#REDIRECT Lady chapel" no quotes at the top of the page. But please only do so if you have searched per WP:CommonName that it means the same. History2007 (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC

2015 merge

He didn't. Lady Chapel shouldn't redirect here: it is a name referring to specific places, not the general lower-case concept. —

Llywelyn II

10:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who didn't what? This is a nonsense distinction. The other article should perhaps be turned into a list. I didn't realize Lady chapel existed when I de-disammed Lady Chapel, which is a list of WP church articles that mention a Lady chapel, however briefly. That is not a disam page, and is best treated as a list. Johnbod (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

support merge Can't see any need for two article here. A list of notable chapels can be incorporated into it. If it did have to be a separate article, then it should be List of lady chapels anyway. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
support merge "Lady Chapel" and "Lady chapel" is too fine a distinction. Consider WP:RF. I agree with Andy, have Lady chapel as an article with a suitable hat note, Lady Chapel as a redirect and List of Lady Chapels as a list. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, though it would fit as a section here too, as an alternative. Johnbod (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

support merge I don't understand why two articles are necessary either. That said, whoever merges the articles should check for all the links that go to the old page as I piped a lot of links away from this page to the main page but now, once the merge is complete, those piped links can be removed and normal ones put in place. SamWilson989 (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]