Jump to content

Talk:Lansdown Crescent, Bath

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Centre house photo?

[edit]
Lansdown Crescent, Bath, central houses.jpg

The photo that claims to be the "the centre house" now doesn't look at all like the centre house. A photo of the, possibly two, central houses is on the right. In fact the photo looks identical to houses in the Royal Crescent, see eg File:Royal.crescent.bath.arp.jpg. Rwendland (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I removed that picture from Lansdown Crescent, Bath (which I didn't take so I cannot contest). The picture that is now on the article IS the centre house of Lansdown Crescent (I took it). I think the previous photo was there by mistake. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I got confused by the previous error, indeed I will revert my edits and move to Royal Crescent.


Untitled

[edit]

Image here appears to be Royal crescent, not Lansdown

Royal Crescent was by Wood, not Palmer. Richard Pinch 22:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

now the photos are right --Elisa.rolle (talk) 11:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lansdown Crescent, Bath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]