Talk:Larry Correia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

Sad Puppies / Genre Criticism

This page seems awfully bald of discussion of the role played by Correia in driving a conservative critique of the state of awards and recognition in the SciF-Fantasy genre. As the Sad Puppy voting bloc around the Hugo Awards is deemed sufficiently notable for its own page at Wikipedia, I'd argue that the author's views, position, and influence within this movement are likewise notable. I do not have the time or knowhow to vet reliable sources, nor the knowhow to source items on his page, but I do know this all got discussed in the industry press and beyond. 2600:2B00:9214:4800:21AC:1A2A:4EE7:5ACC (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, too. Pursuant to Wikipedia:Be bold, I'm going to add a section now. Keshiik (talk) 00:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay -- done. It could use some more info about his role in the campaigns beyond founding it. However, I'm having some trouble finding non-primary, non-self published sources. If anyone has ideas, I'm all ears. ^__^ Keshiik (talk) 01:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]