Jump to content

Talk:Lauric acid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This statement "Lauric acid is a solid at room temperature but melts easily in boiling water, so liquid lauric acid can be treated with various solutes and used to determine their molecular masses." is unclear. Is there a wiki page that describes this process to link to? 64.81.100.143 10:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can a German speaker copy over the chemistry sidebar from the de. article? Ec- 23:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Health Effects section

[edit]

This brief section contains a sentence that is hard for a scientist to read: "Lauric acid is able to raise metabolism, believed to be due to its activation of 20% of thyroidal hormones, which otherwise lie dormant". This should be definitely dropped, as the "raise metabolism"-expression itself is meaningless, let alone the whole speculative sentence around it, including the "activation" of "20% of hormones", which otherwise would "lie dormant". 213.243.137.56 (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please note that "the TC:HDL-C ratio ... is significantly decreased by lauric acid consumption (Fig. 3). These effects suggest little CHD benefit of replacing myristic, palmitic, or stearic acid with CHO, and potential harm of replacing lauric acid with CHO. (Renata Micha • Dariush Mozaffarian 2010. Saturated Fat and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes: a Fresh Look at the Evidence. Lipids (2010) 45:893–905.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter.kabai (talk • contribs) 11:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coconut Oil

[edit]

A Raymond Peat article seems to be the source of much rampant online linking of coconut oil to stimulating the thyroid and raising the metabolism, but without citations. It seems to further be speculated that this is the case, here and elsewhere, because of coconut oil's high lauric acid content, but also without citations. I did some moderate searching around and couldn't find any citations or hard research studies regarding any of this besides the Peat article regarding the first point, but it is vague, or maybe deliberately lacking citations, on the studies it mentions. (link to this Peat article in question: [1]) If no one can find reliable sources for the health effect claims mentioned here soon, these should be removed. mmortal03 (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Astrocaryum murumuru

[edit]

Lauric acid content from http://www.fromnaturewithlove.com/product.asp?product_id=BUTMURU added. I tried adding this reference (which may be of dubious quality) to the Astrocaryum murumuru article but failed since it has become rather complicated to add Wikipedia references (also they seem to be handled in different ways in different articles). This is a shame since many references will not be added if it is too complicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lauric acid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lauric acid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lauric_acid&oldid=1200110453"