Jump to content

Talk:Leander-class frigate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

South African Navy Service

[edit]

Correct me if I'm wrong. Two Leander-class frigates served with the S.A. Navy along with the Westland Wasp helicopter. The ships were refitted at one time and scrapped or sold in the 1990s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC) They weren't Leander class frigates - they were the earlier Rothesay class frigates. In SA they were known as President class.Tigershoot (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

I put a POV tag on the article, mainly for the intro: "was arguably the most successful and popular class of frigates in the Royal Navy's modern history." Citation please for such a confident assertion? And "It had an unusually high public profile, due to the popular and acclaimed Warship BBC television drama series." -- both the "unusally high profile" and "acclaimed" assertions being uncited. Mark83 (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't so much a POV issue as a {{fact}} issue. I really see the NPOV tag as being for a problem with the substance of an article or section being geared toward some particular viewpoint, rather than an issue with the rhetorical flourishes requiring citations. It's not as though there's an alternative viewpoint, that the Leanders were lowly and obscure ships, getting short shrift. I'm changing the tags. DCB4W (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Batches and structure of article

[edit]

There were really 10 batch 1 ships with Y100 engine and 6 batch 2 ships with Y136 engine. However two of the batch 1 ships (Penelope and Cleopatra) had the so-called batch 2 conversion.

The article needs the structure changing, so that it talks first about the ships as originally built, and then about the various conversions. And quoting sources in citations. I will try to do some of these much needed modifications.--Toddy1 (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the above.

I think that most/all of the details about the various conversions should be removed from the infobox, and put in the sections for each of the conversions.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leander class frigates of Pakistan Navy

[edit]

PN has decommissioned all Leander class frigates as of 28 October 2006. Sources:

Should I update the article? Hj108 (talk) 13:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations required in the introduction

[edit]

The introduction says:

"The Leander class, or Type 12I frigates,[1] comprising twenty-six vessels, was among[citation needed] the most numerous and long-lived classes of frigate in the Royal Navy's modern history. The class was built in three batches between 1959 and 1973. It had an unusually high public profile,[citation needed] due to the popular and acclaimed Warship BBC television drama series."
  • Where is the citation for them being among the most numerous and long-lived classes of frigate""? It needs a citation to back up this statement - i.e. how do them compare with other classes of modern RN frigates?
  • Where is the citation for It had an unusually high public profile? The cause of this supposedly unusual public profile was a TV series. The TV series cannot be the citation for them having an unusual public profile. Did the Leanders have a higher public profile than the Ark Royal, the Brilliant, or Type 23s? All of whom were at one time the stars of TV series.

--Toddy1 (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Postwar Frigates

Falklands War

[edit]

Didn't some of these vessels serve in the Falklands War on the British side? MPS1992 (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Leander-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The archived version looks ok, although it does not specify HMS Danae. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leander-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leander-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Admiralty Type numbering confusion

[edit]

Please see Talk:Rothesay-class frigate. Alansplodge (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

40mm Bofors on HMNZS Canterbury.

[edit]

I suspect that drawing comment is wrong. Canterbury was one of the last Leanders to comission, and I can't recall any photos of her without seacat. The RNZN had received the Rothesays with single 40mm but had converted them to seacat mid 1960's well before the arrival of Canterbury. I doubt she ever mounted a single 40mm on the hangar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.25.130 (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Leander-class_frigate&oldid=1213135536"