Talk:Les Passions

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Les Passions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

NPOV

I think this article is neutral Why has it been flagged as not being?Lilymaielang 11:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Probably because the article's primary author is clearly associated with the topic - being "the translator for the orchestra" - and thus may not have a neutral viewpoint. This is not a criticism of you personally, just a Wikipedia policy, and possibly {{autobiography}} should have been used instead of {{npov}}. User:Smappy, who added the NPOV flag, may care to comment. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a comment on the neutrality of the article might be a good way to have others verify its neutrality. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think it is neutral? I've also added sources.Lilymaielang 19:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilymaielang (talk • contribs)

It's not really about the number of sources—as Mitch said, the simple fact of your affiliation with the orchestra makes the article's neutrality questioned. Sources are always a good thing (by the way, please add inline citations: see WP:REF), but neutrality refers to how the author phrases his sentences, or, in this case, how closely he's related to the article's subject. Basically, it boils down to only putting out the raw facts almost like an automaton.

If you'd like to get feedback from more people, I'd suggest posting at WP:RFC. (And please type ~~~~ after your comments on talk pages—that way, SineBot won't keep stalking you. :) —La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 18:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Les Passions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]