Jump to content

Talk:Life of Joseph Smith from 1831 to 1834

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article

[edit]

I realize that

a) This article has been copied wholesale from the original article on Joseph Smith, Jr.

b) It will probably be (and in fact needs to be) split up, at least once more.

c) Even as it stands, it needs MAJOR work and expansion.

However, I pretty much did this so we could make the article on Joseph Smith, Jr. more concise and readable, without losing any information. That's my reason. Please work on this article. --Trevdna 15:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plural marriage

[edit]

Re: recent edit asserting that the issue of J. Smith's polygamy is not settled. Dated sources please -- if this issue is still in contention, it would be appropriate for a paragraph in a number of articles. WBardwin 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subjectivity

[edit]

As a non-mormon (atheist) reader, I can't help but think this article appears rather subjective. I can't see a single source that is not either a Mormon religious document, or a scholar/follower of the religion. It is akin to suggesting King David defeated Goliath in year something BC, citing it as verified history, with the only sources being the Bible and related documents and scholars. I know this is all a bit of a touchy subject, but religious documents and church scholars being used as sources for church related biographies is about as far from objective as one can get. Khahla (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Being a believer does not necessarily mean that one cannot also be true to the historical method, and be a respected and respectable historian and scholar. Mormon studies (as an academic discipline) by those who are not of that faith tradition is relatively new, so the larger portion of what is currently available on any particular related topic is often both by and for the Latter Day Saints themselves. What should not be welcome in the article (and is thankfully missing) are items of Mormon folklore, or sources that are unduly apologetic, polemic, or anti-whatever. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think that's a very valid point about Mormon studies being somewhat limited, and I agree that one can be a believer of a faith and follow rigorous academic standards - depending of course on how strongly one believes. It's not uncommon to meet someone who is unwilling to believe something, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. The problem is also that Brigham Young University - the oldest and by far the largest LDS educational institution and source of most studies in the field, has issued statements that limit Academic freedom at brigham young university including the dismissal of faculty who speak (much less publish) material that contradicts church doctrine. Some archeological and historical research conducted by BYU scholars is...colorful to say the least. Your point about the article not being unduly apologetic or polemic is quite correct, so consider any objection withdrawn. Khahla (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Life of Joseph Smith from 1831 to 1834. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Life of Joseph Smith from 1831 to 1834. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Life_of_Joseph_Smith_from_1831_to_1834&oldid=1201538737"