This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Yes, I didn't merge the old discussion pages. The majority of the old articles had none, or were deletion/spam reports on content since changed.
I do believe link popularity belongs in this article (the focus of all these linking methods), but if you can put it in a better context, please do.
I did try to fix redirects from the older merges to the best of my ability.
Cwolfsheep (talk) 02:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Hnancy (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Can I merge the content from reciprocal links to social bookmarking into the category of "types of link building"?
Hnancy (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Hi I am Hnancy! I am currently editing this page as my class project homework.(That we have to improve a wikipedia topic content significantly) I am new to wikipedia editing group and I am working hard try to make contributions. By now I add a description section, group the link types in a new section called "types of links", add an editorial link type and an acquired link type. I am in a hurry for my homework so please give me recommendations if I make mistakes. Thanks guys!
Hnancy (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)I add a section for link building tactics, please leave me messages if it didn't look good at you and feel free to edit it.
This edit came up for review on the Special:PendingChanges list and I rejected it. I did so for several reasons, first its not written in an encyclopedia manner. It's also based on a single source which is a non-WP:RS blog. Its also so closely paraphrased that it borders on being a copyright violation. --Scalhotrod(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 18:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)