This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
EMI distributed labels which EMI does not own.
This list is only for acts which recorded for EMI-owned labels. Hollywood Records while it is distributed in parts of the world by EMI, it is not owned by EMI. Hollywood Records is owned by Disney Music Group. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. Jafeluv (talk) 05:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Support Yes, this article should follow the formats of the other major record companies. Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - I think that the current name is a much better phrasing, and that "List of x artists" lacks neutrality - it gives the impression that the label "owns" or "created" the artists (and Courtney Love might argue that that is the de facto truth!). So instead, I propose some reverse moving, to:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Hmm... Perhaps Jafeluv moved the article too soon, dramatic made a very good point. Even before he suggested it I was wondering the same thing...
Well, damn. Now what? It would be a bit odd if we moved it twice in a row... Elecbullet (talk) 04:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I do not believe that the bolding of sections in the article is justified; I haven't seen anything like it even in the WP:MOS unless I missed it? The increase of bolding in many discography sections of musicians' biography articles has begun to concern me. Perhaps, like the warning of minimizing the use of underlining might help to discontinue this issue? --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC)