Jump to content

Talk:List of Phi Beta Sigma members/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Famous vs Notable Members

I believe it is important to preface the list with a paragraph that alludes as to a description of what we mean by FAMOUS. While I understand that we cannot provide every possible example as a member of the organization I struggle with the process of how these list of members is compiled. Also, what other categories in life/career are deemed to be under the moniker of FAMOUS. Thanks Ricardo

I believe that this list is a compilation of notable sigmas as opposed to famous sigmas; Members of Phi Beta Sigma that have made an impact in their respective professional fields or have some public notability Educatedblkman1914

Titles

The men listed should not have 'Bro.' in front of thier name as everyone on Wiki is not a Sigma. Also, this list is only to show members of PBS, so it is a pretty safe assumption that all men listed are members of PBS.LivelyIvy1908 20:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I also think that there should be more RS to say that these men are actually a part of Phi Beta Sigma. Miranda 03:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't have any sources, but there does need to be sources. The Ross book has some, but I lent it to a friend. What do you think about listing such as 'Dr. John Doe; first to earn PhD from XYX Univ.' Should Dr. be placed in from of thier name if it is also mentioned that they earned a doctorate?LivelyIvy1908 03:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Like for the AKA list, I didn't use titles. I guess we shouldn't use them per consistency, but it's your choice. I don't have access to PBS materials. Miranda 03:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Revamping

I am in the process of completely revamping this article in an attempt to improve the it's classification and give it a look that is consistent with other fraternity and sorority articles of it's type. This will include a preface and a reformat to all lists within the article. I would appreciate any help from more experienced wikipedians in the execution of this task. Thanks Eduactedblkman1914 03:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Educatedblkman1914 (talk • contribs)

I can help with revamping. I was actually going to start this on this week after adding references last week. The changes you have made so far look good, but I don't think the Distinguised Service Chapter should be a part of this article. DSC is internal to the fraternity and most of the 160+ members are already listed elsewhere in the article. Rashad1103 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for help on this project and you make a valid point about DSC members and its relation to this article. Do you think that this information could be moved to the main article, or should just be deleted outright? Eduactedblkman1914 18:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Educatedblkman1914 (talk • contribs)
I think the DSC should be completed in a template and included in the main Phi Beta Sigma article under the Membership section similar to how the International Presidents section is. On another note I would like to have this list reviewed soon for featured article status after further cleanup. I think any unreferenced names should be moved to this discussion until a reference can be found for each.Rashad1103 (talk) 15:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree on both suggestions that you brought up, lets make it happen! Educatedblkman1914 05:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Educatedblkman1914 (talk • contribs)

Unreferenced Names

The following list of names are those of Phi Beta Sigma Members who, at the present time are lacking the proper references in order to be included in the article List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers Educatedblkman1914 05:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Many of these names are included on the International Website, would this not be a proper reference?Occasio (talk) 19:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
If they are listed on the National Website, That is acceptable. If information on where these men were initiated could be found that would be even better --Educatedblkman1914 22:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Educatedblkman1914 (talk • contribs)
Sorry, but no, that is not acceptable. The organization's website is obviously not a reliable source. Two things must be verified: a. the person's BLP information (esp. their membership) must be verified independently, and b. the person's notability (that is, whether they should even be mentioned here) needs to be established independently. For the latter, having an article on Wikipedia is usually deemed enough evidence--and tons of the people here do not have that. Drmies (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
The organization's website is the MOST reliable source! Anyone can claim themself or someone else to be a member of an organization, but only the official membership history of the organization can provide verification. I tend to agree with your second point about notability.--Rashad1103 (talk) 15:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Dumping Ground for Entries that fail to Meet List Criteria

I've created a Subpage for Sigma Brothers who, at present time, fail to make the main list for one, or more of the following reasons:

  • Notability – People meeting Wikipedia's notability standards make for good inclusions to the list. Its a good rule of thumb that a person lacking a wikipedia article should not be included. For more see: Wp:Notability (people)
  • Citations/Reliable Sources– Entries must have reference citations that provide validity to a person being affiliated with Phi Beta Sigma. Those entries lacking citations are automatically moved to the subpage. For more see: wp:Identifying reliable sources

--Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 17:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

The image File:EllisBranfordMarsalis.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Phi_Beta_Sigma_members/Archive_1&oldid=1177816281"