Talk:List of Warner Bros. films (1918–1919)

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• List of Warner Bros. films (1918–1929)
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:List of Warner Bros. films (1918–1929)

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Image copyright problem with File:Warner Bros.svg[edit]

The image File:Warner Bros.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding MGM films owned by Warner[edit]

Some joker keeps on adding "The Wizard of Oz" and "Gone With the Wind" to the list when they are not really Warner Bros. films. They're owned by WB, yes, but they did not release them. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Considering no movie studio writes their films, as writers are independently hired from outside, the complexity is nothing more than a side effect of being a middleman. May as well just stop trying to find any sanity within.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.166.161 (talk) 05:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2014[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

for the Fountain, in which Fox distributed worldwide it didn't distributed in France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Portugal leaving only five countries not distributed in five countries, put it in on it. 82.1.164.58 (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2014[edit]

This edit request to List of Warner Bros. films has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

19 May 2014

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2014[edit]

This edit request to List of Warner Bros. films has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Please add the Entourage film to the list of Upcoming WB films Adam-4Rizzel (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take off the billion brick race[edit]

The billion brick race has been taken off its release date put it ob tba for now please Jstar367 (talk) 00:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 26/10/2018 film[edit]

Christopher Nolan is not directing another film and I already checked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.62.243 (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Rim: Uprising[edit]

I want Pacific Rim Uprising to be distributed by Warner Bros. in the international worldwide territories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.93.115 (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Release dates[edit]

Can yall please help me out? Jstar367 (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Flash date[edit]

The flash has been put on hiatus please put it on tba Jstar367 (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have a citation to a reliable source for its release date. What's your source that it's on hiatus? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crossover?[edit]

Can y'all please get rid of crossover it isn't a movie Jstar367 (talk) 23:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

This is outrageously long and will only get longer. A logical way would be to split by decade. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. All big studio film lists should be split the same way like Paramount is done. By decade. Picsovina (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technicolor/Technicolour[edit]

Both spelling are used in the article. Shouldn't it be consistently one or the other? Michael Glass (talk) 13:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]